WSWiki - Recent changes [en-gb]

Talk:IEE

2010-09-09T02:36:50Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 9 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	However, when I read Rick's own description of IEEs (on his blog), it is obvious that he is trying to follow a certain system, i.e. trying to match the description to fit the theoretical properties of each element in each position. I like that idea and was wondering if you were also trying to do such a thing. I'm not sure, though, as for example I don't particularly see any information regarding the "opinionated" and "absolutely certain" nature of conclusions from the leading function. Unless you disagree with that... [[User:Cone\|Cone]] 03:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)		However, when I read Rick's own description of IEEs (on his blog), it is obvious that he is trying to follow a certain system, i.e. trying to match the description to fit the theoretical properties of each element in each position. I like that idea and was wondering if you were also trying to do such a thing. I'm not sure, though, as for example I don't particularly see any information regarding the "opinionated" and "absolutely certain" nature of conclusions from the leading function. Unless you disagree with that... [[User:Cone\|Cone]] 03:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	: i am not trying to follow a certain system to fit theoretical properties of functions, but I have no doubt that some theoretical aspects of functions will be apparent. wherever I can it is more of a priority for me to describe my observations of people that i've typed as this. as you might notice, I'm also borrowing heavily from rick's IEE description on his blog in writing this particular one, and his information is quite descriptive about {{I}} in IEEs but rather poorly descriptive of {{R}} in my opinion, which of course is where i'm stuck. i don't think i'll have time to finish it to my satisfaction for a while. [[User:Aestrivex\|aestrivex, chicken of destroyers]] 02:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Talk:IEE

2010-09-07T03:43:21Z

New page: Nice to see you filling in the leftover descriptions. :) Not bad, very descriptive. However, when I read Rick's own description of IEEs (on his blog), it is obvious that he is trying to ...

New page

Nice to see you filling in the leftover descriptions. :) Not bad, very descriptive.

However, when I read Rick's own description of IEEs (on his blog), it is obvious that he is trying to follow a certain system, i.e. trying to match the description to fit the theoretical properties of each element in each position. I like that idea and was wondering if you were also trying to do such a thing. I'm not sure, though, as for example I don't particularly see any information regarding the "opinionated" and "absolutely certain" nature of conclusions from the leading function. Unless you disagree with that... [[User:Cone|Cone]] 03:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Cone/userlist

2010-09-07T03:34:43Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 7 September 2010
(2 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~heh~~...	+	This is my userlist. I'm trying to be as careful as I can here, so most people I list I have a rather reasonable opinion of. I'll let you know when I am unsure of something. This list will probably grow enormously slowly.
		+
		+	== People in the online Socionics community ==
		+
		+	=== ChibiKeba ===
		+
		+	My typing is '''ESI'''. I used to think SEI, for not completely-known reasons, however recently she posted a description of her new boyfriend which I think makes this typing rather obvious. Unfortunately, she erased that description, so I am going mostly from memory and some tidbits that still remain online.
		+
		+	She described her boyfriend as rather open-minded and incredibly optimistic, while for herself, she was rather pessimistic, specifically about people, until she met this guy. Right off the bat would I consider an extravert for the guy and an introvert for her. What solidifies ESI in my mind are a number of anecdotes about him and how these affected her: specifically, that he is very optimistic to the point of being "dumb" about trusting people, which helped her learn to trust people more than she had in the past. Also was another anecdote about him trusting in a certain person who turned out to be a child molester, someone who she had major doubts about from the start and tried to warn him about. I would also go so far to say that he and her are an LIE-ESI dual couple.
		+
		+	Also, I remember in the past that her art had a liberal usage of {{F}} in it, although I cannot remember much of the specifics.
		+
		+	''(may come back and shape this up a bit more...)''

User:Aestrivex/scifi

2010-09-06T06:01:36Z

doctor who:

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 6 September 2010
Line 375:		Line 375:
	! '''PERSON''' !! '''STRENGTH''' !! '''MY TYPING''' !! '''ACTOR''' !! '''ACTOR TYPING'''		! '''PERSON''' !! '''STRENGTH''' !! '''MY TYPING''' !! '''ACTOR''' !! '''ACTOR TYPING'''
	\|-		\|-
-	\| The Doctor \|\| C \|\| {{ILE}} \|\| various \|\| various	+	\| The Doctor \|\| A \|\| {{ILE}} \|\| various \|\| various
	\|-		\|-
-	\| Rose Tyler \|\| ? \|\| ? \|\| Billie Piper \|\| ?	+	\| Rose Tyler \|\| B \|\| {{SEE}} \|\| Billie Piper \|\| ?
	\|-		\|-
	\| Jackie Tyler \|\| B \|\| {{ESE}} \|\| Camille Coduri \|\| ?		\| Jackie Tyler \|\| B \|\| {{ESE}} \|\| Camille Coduri \|\| ?

User:Ragnar/Latest okcupid dating persona test survey

2010-09-05T13:12:28Z

Raw data:

Show changes

User:Aestrivex/vlist

2010-09-02T08:54:41Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 2 September 2010
Line 230:		Line 230:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Ezra Klein \|\| C \|\| {{LIE}} \|\| ? \|\| American journalist. Expert on health care reform. Highly knowledgeable, makes an effort to speak directly and accessibly to the common person and explaining the issues by extensive use of analogy, while interpreting the issues as highly complex and malleable and referring to all of the different perspectives in crafting his explanations. Dry speech.		\| Ezra Klein \|\| C \|\| {{LIE}} \|\| ? \|\| American journalist. Expert on health care reform. Highly knowledgeable, makes an effort to speak directly and accessibly to the common person and explaining the issues by extensive use of analogy, while interpreting the issues as highly complex and malleable and referring to all of the different perspectives in crafting his explanations. Dry speech.
		+	\|-
		+	\| Shriram Krishnamurthi \|\| C \|\| {{LIE}} \|\| {{ILI}} \|\| Indian-American computer programmer.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Stanley Kubrick \|\| A \|\| {{ILI}} \|\| none \|\| American film director. Clear example of ILI. Eccentric, cerebral, introspective, and often regrettably polarizing figure who placed a great deal of attention into symbolism, meaning in the stories he told via films.		\| Stanley Kubrick \|\| A \|\| {{ILI}} \|\| none \|\| American film director. Clear example of ILI. Eccentric, cerebral, introspective, and often regrettably polarizing figure who placed a great deal of attention into symbolism, meaning in the stories he told via films.